The article
"Games" by Steven Johnson talks about how video games and books.
Johnson argues that video games can be good and bad for children because it may
promote eye-hand coordination in children, and video games can also promote
aggression and violent responses to conflict. Johnson also brought up McLuhan’s
observation about "the problem with judging new cultural systems on their
own terms is that the presence of the recent past inevitably colors your vision
of the emerging form, highlighting the flaws and imperfections"(Johnson,
2011). In this generation more and more gadgets are coming out that distracts
children and takes most of their time. But if we all think about it most
parents thinks that all new things are bad for children weather its a type of
gadget or a type of clothing style. Johnson mentioned a thought experiment
where video games were invented before books; what would parents, teachers and
cultural authorities would say about reading? In my opinion Steven Johnson
article has a very valid point on how most people judge newly invented objects.
I also think that if video games were invented before book everyone will say
that books are not good for children because books isolates children from the
outside world and it prevents kids to socialize with other people. Books
require its reader's full attention to engage with the reading. I personally
think that we should balance our time between reading and gaming. I honestly
think that parents should let their kids play during the day and read before
bedtime; Because having your reading skills in place will help us in the long
run especially most employers hire people with a great reading skills.
Nice summery!!! I like the conclusion part most, I feel the same. keep up the good work.
ReplyDelete